The Academy is Silencing Beyoncé to Protect Racist White Feminism
As a graduate student in Race Politics and Black Feminism, I am entirely too familiar with what it means to be silenced and excluded from feminist theories and narratives which have historically been focused on middle class White women.
In my academic career at private White institutions (PWIs), I have had liberal White students – usually young women who consider themselves feminists – say things to me like “sorry we’re not all from the ghetto” and “this conversation is about women, not Black people.” These experiences are precisely why the Politicizing Beyoncé course at Rutgers University is so vital. But, it’s been cancelled. And, it is simply a travesty that the institutions meant to educate this country’s next generation of leaders and scholars do not use courses like these to disrupt the racist tendencies of mainstream White feminism. Instead, they reinscribe a status quo which ostracizes Black feminism and its most prominent members, namely Beyoncé.
Everyone is talking about the Politicizing Beyoncé course in Black Feminism being cancelled this fall but few are talking about the continued questioning of Beyonce’s claim to feminism by the White mainstream. I can only infer that this course is going away, at least in part, because of the tired argument that Beyoncé is not feminist enough to wear the title so easily granted to folks like Tina Fey, Lena Dunham and Amy Schumer. These women’s problematic views on race have been well-documented. Yet, they remain unapologetic gatekeepers to feminism in the 21st century. At times, it seems for White women in the limelight, just saying they are feminist is reason enough to ordain them as such. But, for Black women, the standards are much higher, perhaps even impossible to reach.
To combat this reality, Professor Kevin Allred has been teaching the Politicizing Beyoncé course since 2010. Several students of the course have published their overwhelmingly positive experiences in the class. Granted, these students are usually women and of color but that does not diminish the importance of the course in general.
According to Allred, he received pushback about the course because of its popularity. He told The Guardian: “Behind the scenes, they told me that because so many people wanted to take it, it was detracting from other courses. But beyond that, I have seen a larger issue with Beyoncé intervening in academic debates and black feminism in general.” His latter sentiment is not lost on me. Last year, there was think piece after think piece about Beyoncé’s feminism. Writers were hell bent on nitpicking every move the singer made to check to see if her brand of feminism was up to their standards. It seems Black feminists are always under the watchful eye of mainstream White Feminism, a focus rarely given to White women.
We infrequently see the same predominantly White women writers railing against the antics of their White women faves who have the lowest of bars for entry into the White Feminist Inner Sanctum. The manifold options of inclusion for White feminists both in the Academy and in pop culture are often exclusive to Whites, harmful to non-Whites, and violent toward Black women in particular. This has been the case for over a century. Sadly, it doesn’t seem to be ending any time soon.
The Academy is supposed to teach something different from the mainstream though. It is supposed to move away from what is popular and toward pedagogy which is most beneficial to students. However, in my experience, the Academy continues to reinforce the same gendered and racial barriers to feminism and racial dialogue seen in most industries. This particular case is yet another way the Academy reminds Black feminists that our brands of feminism are not sufficient. I, as a Black Feminist and an academic, am personally disappointed in the course’s cancellation. Though, I’m not surprised. I am well aware of the biases in the field to which I hope to contribute over my lifetime.
As long as the Academy exercises the same gatekeeper tactics to feminism we see in the mainstream, we will continue to see Black women on the margins in a field they have been innovating for over one hundred years. Part of the reason I came to the Academy was to disrupt this tradition.
Apparently, I still have my work cut out for me.
Photo Credit: Public domain image
[H/T The Guardian]
Rutgers Department of Women’s and Gender Studies Statement on Politicizing Beyoncé
We were saddened to read the recent Guardian essay written regarding
“Politicizing Beyoncé”, a course formerly taught here in Women’s &
Gender Studies by Kevin Allred, an ABD graduate student who served as a
part time lecturer.
Though we decline to comment regarding any particular class or instructor, we
would like to emphasize that in line with university requirements and
best academic practices, all courses are routinely examined, and course
schedules are determined based on a number of factors, including, but
not limited to, departmental needs and program requirements, faculty
expertise, and intellectual integrity. Course enrollments alone however
popular the course, cannot become the deciding factor for offering a
course in any given year.
The Women’s & Gender Studies department at Rutgers University is one of
the oldest and most highly regarded programs in the country. We have
noted Black feminist scholars in our core and graduate faculty,
including Nikol Alexander-Floyd, current undergraduate director, Abena
P.A. Busia, current department chair, as well as Brittney Cooper (whose
comments to the Guardian were taken out of context), among others. These
Black feminist scholars have contributed greatly towards the positive
history of teaching black feminist scholarship in our department. It is
well known that courses on black feminism and that center on Black women
have been offered through our department for decades, and we take great
pride in the work we do.
–from Rutgers Department of Women’s & Gender Studies Homepage: http://womens-studies.rutgers.edu/events/805-rutgers-department-of-women-s-and-gender-studies-statement-on-politicizing-beyonce
Brittney Cooper’s Response to Guardian Article on Politicizing Beyoncé
In Lauren Duca’s op-ed at the Guardian
on December 16, 2015, she took comments that I offered about pop singer
Beyoncé out of context for a larger argument she wanted to make about
the canceling of a course called “Politicizing Beyoncé.” The course was
formerly offered in the Rutgers Department of Women’s and Gender
Studies, where I am an assistant professor. I did not know about the
course having been canceled until Duca called me, and I informed her
that I was not able to speak at any level to the reasons for the course
cancellation during our conversation. When she asked me whether Women’s
and Gender Studies as a discipline was hostile to the study of pop
culture figures like Beyoncé, I disagreed. In Fall 2015, I taught an
upper-level special topics course on Hip Hop Generation Feminism, in
which we discussed many pop culture figures including Beyoncé. I also
let her know that in my experience, the Rutgers Department of Women’s
and Gender Studies has been incredibly supportive of my work as a
scholar of Black feminism and popular culture. My larger comments about
the valuation of scholarship on Black women in academe more
generally was meant to address a general trend, rather than to indict or
otherwise implicate my department, who in fact supports the very kinds
of scholarship that counteracts this trend. The ways she chose to frame
my comments supported an agenda and set of beliefs that I do not share,
and I regret that my comments have been taken in this manner. Rutgers
Department of Women’s and Gender Studies has been critical to supporting
sound and rigorous Black feminist scholarship nationally and they
continue to support both faculty and graduate students who work in these
areas.
–from Rutgers Department of Women’s & Gender Studies Homepage:
http://womens-studies.rutgers.edu/events/806-brittney-cooper-s-response-to-guardian-article-on-politicizing-beyonce