Politicians Say The Darndest Things
Politicians say the “darndest” things. No, seriously they do. Last week it was White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs patronizing American Urban Radio Network’s April Ryan by condescendingly comparing her tough interrogation to his son’s temper tantrums. Don’t believe me, ask Summer. Yesterday it was Harry Reid, tomorrow it will be someone else. Can I blame them for their candidness? Absolutely not. Sometimes Freudian slips are the only way we as the public can see the real side of government officials. While Robert Gibbs’ comments were as Summer put “sexually racialized” or “racially sexualized”, I think Harry Reid’s comments were right on point. Yeah I said it.
In a prepared floor speech on Monday Harry Reid compared Republican efforts to block health care reform, to anti-abolitionists who wanted to maintain that thing called the “peculiar institution” and the folks who wanted to keep Blacks and Women as second-class citizens.
“Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all Republicans have come up with is this: Slow down, stop everything, let’s start over. You think you’ve heard these same excuses before, you’re right. In this country, there were those who dug in their heels and said, Slow down, it’s too early. Let’s wait, things aren’t bad enough about slavery. When women want to vote, slow down, there will be a better day to do that. The day isn’t quite right. This body was on the verge of guaranteeing civil rights to everyone, regardless of the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today. History is repeating itself before our eyes. There are now those who don’t think it is the right time to reform health care. If not now, when?”
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65wi22hB8q4
Did he go there? Yes he did. I’m damn happy that he did. The struggle for health care reform is not just a public policy issue, it is a human rights issue. Unfortunately, Republican Party National Committee Chairman Michael Steele doesn’t see it that way. In fact he thinks Reid was “far out of bounds with his absurd and offensive comments.” What offends me is that in this “post racial society” today 17 percent of Hispanic, and 16 percent of Black Americans report they are in only fair or poor health, compared with 10 percent of White Americans (http://www.ahrq.gov/research/disparit.htm). Of the 16% of American adults who don’t have health insurance 41% are Hispanic, 28.6% earn less than $36,000 annually, and 19.9% are African-American. These patterns reveal that there are some inherent inequities in the disastrous healthcare system that continues to neglect poor and minority constituents. An unconscionable number of Black men die every year from preventable diseases such as obesity and cardiovascular disease. Many of these folks are dying because they treat the emergency room as their primary care center. But what do these numbers mean to Michael Steele? Not much. Can I really expect a guy who thought he could give the Republican party a “hip-hop makeover” to understand what’s going on in the real world?
Senator John McCain joined the choir of self-righteous Republicans and has demanded a Senator Harry Reid apology. I could’ve seen this one coming from a mile away. Of course John McCain doesn’t recognize the importance of civil and human rights; he voted against a Senate measure to make Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday a federal holiday. So why should Harry Reid apologize? For telling the truth about the human rights issue that is the health care crisis. For recognizing that health care is a human right that over 30 million Americans don’t enjoy. For putting the interests of poor and people of color upfront. I don’t think we need an apology. We need more political leaders to tell the truth and stand up for all people!
“The struggle for health care reform is not just a public policy issue, it is a human rights issue.”
Absolutely. I’m in New York, and by the time I got to my uncle’s apt they had taken him to the hospital. He refused to go to Harlem Hospital b/c of their rep. I think it’s a travesty that he doesn’t want to go to the hospital closest to him because of the care. I think it’s a travesty that he has the luxury of excellent health insurance while others don’t. I think it’s a travesty that I got nervous when my grandmother briefly lost his insurance card. And I think it’s a travesty that although he’s at a great hospital, the whole set-up seemed really disorganized.
You’re right, Edward, this is a human rights issue, and folks need to recognize it as such. Everyone needs to be able to get the same level of care no matter where they go and no matter who they are. And access to that care should not be applied to one’s employment status.
“The struggle for health care reform is not just a public policy issue, it is a human rights issue.”
Absolutely. I’m in New York, and by the time I got to my uncle’s apt they had taken him to the hospital. He refused to go to Harlem Hospital b/c of their rep. I think it’s a travesty that he doesn’t want to go to the hospital closest to him because of the care. I think it’s a travesty that he has the luxury of excellent health insurance while others don’t. I think it’s a travesty that I got nervous when my grandmother briefly lost his insurance card. And I think it’s a travesty that although he’s at a great hospital, the whole set-up seemed really disorganized.
You’re right, Edward, this is a human rights issue, and folks need to recognize it as such. Everyone needs to be able to get the same level of care no matter where they go and no matter who they are. And access to that care should not be applied to one’s employment status.
Harry Reid is comparing those who do not think like he does to plantation masters trying to justify the continuation of slavery.
Does Harry Reid really believe his viewpoint is “the right side of history”?
“Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all Republicans have come up with is this: Slow down, stop everything, let’s start over.”
This is a blatant lie. The people who don’t think like him aren’t saying slow down, they are saying that there are BETTER ways of providing health care; like allowing health care providers to sell their wares across state lines to improve competition (read: lower prices), or allowing individuals to get the same tax breaks that employers get when purchasing health insurance packages. How about trying REAL options instead of belittling those whose views differ from his?
“This body was on the verge of guaranteeing civil rights to everyone, regardless of the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today.”
Mr. Reid needs to have one of his interns tell him about the Civil Rights Act of 1964; it was the Democratic Party that threatened to filibuster, and if you look up the vote, 69% of Democrats in Congress voted for the Act while 82% of Republicans voted for it. If he wanted to go back even farther, the reason the Republican Party was formed back in the 1800s was because a Democratic President, Franklin Pierce, allowed slavery to spread into the western states after he made a campaign promise not to allow it.
I could go on about the KKK being founded by Southern Democrats, Democrat President Franklin Delano Roosevelt refusing to meet with Jesse Owens after the Olympic victories, etc., but that would be on the wrong side of this misguided politician’s history.
I respect everyone’s right to support or oppose government health care, but it is dishonest to say that there aren’t any other solutions out there and it is misleading to say that opposition of government-funded health care is even on the same plane as denial of inalienable human rights as written in the United States Constitution.
With all due respect, losing a health insurance card is not on the same level as being beaten and whipped, chased by hunting dogs, and being told you are less than human. Mr. Reid has no idea what he is trying to compare, but someone will believe his lies anyway.
Harry Reid is comparing those who do not think like he does to plantation masters trying to justify the continuation of slavery.
Does Harry Reid really believe his viewpoint is “the right side of history”?
“Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all Republicans have come up with is this: Slow down, stop everything, let’s start over.”
This is a blatant lie. The people who don’t think like him aren’t saying slow down, they are saying that there are BETTER ways of providing health care; like allowing health care providers to sell their wares across state lines to improve competition (read: lower prices), or allowing individuals to get the same tax breaks that employers get when purchasing health insurance packages. How about trying REAL options instead of belittling those whose views differ from his?
“This body was on the verge of guaranteeing civil rights to everyone, regardless of the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today.”
Mr. Reid needs to have one of his interns tell him about the Civil Rights Act of 1964; it was the Democratic Party that threatened to filibuster, and if you look up the vote, 69% of Democrats in Congress voted for the Act while 82% of Republicans voted for it. If he wanted to go back even farther, the reason the Republican Party was formed back in the 1800s was because a Democratic President, Franklin Pierce, allowed slavery to spread into the western states after he made a campaign promise not to allow it.
I could go on about the KKK being founded by Southern Democrats, Democrat President Franklin Delano Roosevelt refusing to meet with Jesse Owens after the Olympic victories, etc., but that would be on the wrong side of this misguided politician’s history.
I respect everyone’s right to support or oppose government health care, but it is dishonest to say that there aren’t any other solutions out there and it is misleading to say that opposition of government-funded health care is even on the same plane as denial of inalienable human rights as written in the United States Constitution.
With all due respect, losing a health insurance card is not on the same level as being beaten and whipped, chased by hunting dogs, and being told you are less than human. Mr. Reid has no idea what he is trying to compare, but someone will believe his lies anyway.
This issue should not be about Democrats and Republicans, nor should it be about political leverage. Unfortunately, volatile rhetoric is inherent in politics, especially when trying to pass landmark legislation. Ken J I agree with you that historically both parties have been on the wrong side of civil and human rights issues.
Every era is defined by some social or political issue that changes the status quo. Hence, I believe that when put in proper temporal context, healthcare is the 21st century’s civil rights issue. Although Harry Reid took a very partisan approach in conveying his message, I think his point is still valid. Clearly, nothing is comparable to the inhumanity of the Holocaust or slavery. However, it is legitimate to compare some folk’s reluctance to extend equal humanity through healthcare to those folks who tried to deny equal humanity in other epochs. The diversity in opinion among healthcare policy wonks proves that there are multiple ways to overhaul the current system, but refusing to acknowledge that inequities exist is folly.
I’m well aware that there are some flexible Republicans who are willing to compromise and some obstinate Democrats who won’t budge. This is not black and white issue in terms of Republicans being bad and Democrats being good. However, refusing to recognize that Healthcare is a human right is not recognizing the full humanity of people, which thus tacitly supports a system that relegates some people to second-class citizenship.
This issue should not be about Democrats and Republicans, nor should it be about political leverage. Unfortunately, volatile rhetoric is inherent in politics, especially when trying to pass landmark legislation. Ken J I agree with you that historically both parties have been on the wrong side of civil and human rights issues.
Every era is defined by some social or political issue that changes the status quo. Hence, I believe that when put in proper temporal context, healthcare is the 21st century’s civil rights issue. Although Harry Reid took a very partisan approach in conveying his message, I think his point is still valid. Clearly, nothing is comparable to the inhumanity of the Holocaust or slavery. However, it is legitimate to compare some folk’s reluctance to extend equal humanity through healthcare to those folks who tried to deny equal humanity in other epochs. The diversity in opinion among healthcare policy wonks proves that there are multiple ways to overhaul the current system, but refusing to acknowledge that inequities exist is folly.
I’m well aware that there are some flexible Republicans who are willing to compromise and some obstinate Democrats who won’t budge. This is not black and white issue in terms of Republicans being bad and Democrats being good. However, refusing to recognize that Healthcare is a human right is not recognizing the full humanity of people, which thus tacitly supports a system that relegates some people to second-class citizenship.
If Mr Reid is truly interested in every citizen having good health care coverage, why doesn’t he have the insurance company that co-writes the senator’s health care given to all citizens??Why did they vote to exempt themselves from this health care bill?? Before the bill was even written.
I find that anytime the senators or representatives,claim to be doing something for the people ,it generally isn’t for the people.
If forcing people to buy health care fails,then the great senator Mr.Reid will be standing there telling you “see I told you the insurance companies were evil.” How is it making the insurance companies behave better when the govt is increasing their business.Have you not seen the stock prices of the insurance companies going up steady for the last month.Want to know why AIG was the first primary bailout?? It’s because every senator and representative have their health care through them as well as their retirement plans.. This only benefits the people who are wealthy to begin with.
If politicians are to be trusted, explain to me why the equal rights amendment has yet to be ratified..I mean it has received extensions (the last one in 1982)but, they have expired…
anybody have anything to add that would enlighten me on that point?? Because I do not see a govt body really wanting to help anybody if they can’t get that one thing ratified…
Thank You ,
I will now sleek back into the shadows from whence I came.
If Mr Reid is truly interested in every citizen having good health care coverage, why doesn’t he have the insurance company that co-writes the senator’s health care given to all citizens??Why did they vote to exempt themselves from this health care bill?? Before the bill was even written.
I find that anytime the senators or representatives,claim to be doing something for the people ,it generally isn’t for the people.
If forcing people to buy health care fails,then the great senator Mr.Reid will be standing there telling you “see I told you the insurance companies were evil.” How is it making the insurance companies behave better when the govt is increasing their business.Have you not seen the stock prices of the insurance companies going up steady for the last month.Want to know why AIG was the first primary bailout?? It’s because every senator and representative have their health care through them as well as their retirement plans.. This only benefits the people who are wealthy to begin with.
If politicians are to be trusted, explain to me why the equal rights amendment has yet to be ratified..I mean it has received extensions (the last one in 1982)but, they have expired…
anybody have anything to add that would enlighten me on that point?? Because I do not see a govt body really wanting to help anybody if they can’t get that one thing ratified…
Thank You ,
I will now sleek back into the shadows from whence I came.