The Bed Intruder Song is not an R. Kelly Jam: So, stop bobbing your head to Sexual Trauma!!
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoLHtzHvyQk&feature=player_embedded
So, am I the only one who finds the YouTube’s “viralization” (yes, I made up a word) of the Bed Intruder Song deeply unsettling and problematic? Every time, I check my Facebook newsfeed I see, yet, another “remix” of the Bed Intruder Song. For those of you who are not familiar with the song, it tells the “real life” story of a young black woman who experienced “sexual violation” (yes, I know she was not penetrated, but that does not mean that she did not experience sexual trauma or sexual violation) when a man climbed through her window while she was sleeping. However, the attack was stopped by the young woman’s brother, Antoine, who helped to scare the man off. And, who, vocally stated on the local news the following evening:
Obviously we have a rapist in Lincoln Park, he is climbin in your window, he’s snatching your people up. So y’all need to hide your kid, hide your wife and hide your husband cause they rapin everybody out here. We got your t-shirt you done left your fingerprints behind and all. You’re so dum, you’re really dumb for real. You don’t have to come and confess what you did, we’re looking for you. We, we’re gonna find you. So you can run and tell that homeboy.
I want to begin be saying that I honor the voice of Antoine and his sister, Kelly, for speaking out, fearlessly, against their attacker. Often, when sexual violations happen silence is a safe response for both men and women to take in order to cope with their abuse. So, I applaud both, sister and brother, for speaking out. And, let’s be honest when was the last time we’ve seen a black man with fierce passion and determination speaking publicly about confronting sexual violence against black women (I took this from M. and other black feminist)? The answer would be: “Not in my recent memory.” So, I have no issue with Antoine and Kelly speaking out.
But, what I take issue with is how the Gregory Brothers and other YouTube celebrity enthusiasts have taken this story of sexual violation and brother’s response to his sister’s sexual violation and have turned it into, yet, another “Chocolate Rain” internet sensation meaning people are taking the words of Antoine Dodson and making all types of music and acting videos mostly caricaturing Antoine as a “homo-thug” and making Kelly Dodson a back-up singer to her brother’s lead singing. I agree with Womanist Musings and Jezebel that Kelly’s survivor story has been completely erased from the narrative and that the reason why her brother, Antoine, is so entertaining is that people see him as, yet, another gender queer black man like Dwight from Atlanta House’s Wives whose sole (i.e. double entendre) plight in life is to entertain people with his “funny” (i.e. double entendre) acting ways. This is extremely problematic on the intersecting levels of homophobia and capitalist racist consumption of black performing bodies. Not cool.
Overall, what people miss in addition to hearing the voice of Kelly is what it means to live in a disadvantaged neighborhood context were people especially black women and girls are constantly at higher risk of being physically, sexually, and mentally violated without justice and retribution. Just look at the black man in Cleveland who was able to rape and kill black women for decades simply by stuffing their dead bodies in the wall of his house or the Grim Sleeper who was able to rape and kill black women who were allegedly street workers for 20 years. There was no public outcry for these stories because they involved devalued poor deviant black female bodies who lived in what sociologist would term disadvantaged neighborhoods.
So, when Kelly Dodson says, “I was attacked by some idiot from out here in the projects”
and her brother Antoine says, “What people fail to realize . . . is our family, we don’t run around crying and acting sad, know what I’m sayin’, we just dust our shoulders off and keep on movin,” they tell a story of what it means to live in a place where stuff like this happens daily and you learn to deal with the problems “individually . . . we will find you,” not the Police who are often themselves perpetrators of crimes against poor brown and black bodies, not the NAACP because they do not get involved in black on black crime (i.e. their response to the 2007 Dunbar Housing Project Rapes), not CAPS which is more about policing us then helping us, not the local Rape Crisis Center that is underfunded and overworked, not the local churches because they are stretched as well, not anyone. “So we will find you.” (Of course, this is not to say that these local institutions are not helpful or needed, but it is to say that neighborhood context which is shaped by larger structures of racism and capitalism shapes the resources available to confront acts of violence against black women and girls).
But, of course some people have suggested that because of the “viralization” of the Bed Intruder song, Kelly Dodson will receive more help than she would have if there was no Bed Intruder video. And to that I say “cow dung.” Once again, the video is not about Kelly’s story. It is about the entertainment of black bodies, consumption of black bodies, website visits, and ad revenues. Because I know for sure that the Gregory brothers, the first group who made the video, did not ask Kelly Dodson if she wanted any portion of her story made into an auto tune video or if she needed help connecting with her local Rape Crisis Center or if she wanted a portion of the money generated from people visiting their website to view the video. I know they did not offer help or resources generated from the creation of the Bed Intruder Song.
Then as if the last suggestion was not bogus then someone else suggested that I should be happy that “at least” people are talking about rape in cyber space. And to this I also say “cow dung.” People are not talking about rape because everyone I talk to about it says she wasn’t raped. But, then I say that just because there is no penetration does not mean that she was not sexually violated. A man who breaks into your home and forces himself upon you is sexual violence. It is. So, though people have made 750 Bed Intruder Song’s videos, I am pretty sure none of them talk specifically about sexual violence and sexual trauma.
All that I can say is this The Bed Intruder Song is not an R. Kelly Jam. So, stop bobbing your head to Sexual Trauma!!
Well said Fallon W. Well said. Keep exposing the cow dung, sista.
The one thing I keep thinking as I watch white dude after white dude make Antoine’s words and Kelly’s experience into a youtube diversion for their friends, is that I feel like masculinity, white masculinity in particular, but masculinity in general has been “punked” by Antoine Dodson. And not to say anyone has been tricked in any way, but to say that maybe the need to attack Antoine’s queerness, comes from shame and not being as brave as Antoine is. At not standing up for their sisters, collectively…i.e US. Because as you point out, he done something that I have NEVER seen a man do, which is to speak out passionately AGAINST RAPE on TV. (And if someone reading this has seen that on TV please YouTube me that.) Maybe that is something the code of masculinity forbids, because they know as well as we do that without the threat of violent domination the world as we know it would change forever and patriarchy couldn’t hold onto its pseudo power. Antoine shows a version what a powerful person actually looks like. And how scary is that for people holding onto fake power?
AND maybe because Antoine has so eloquently and passionately done something that other men, straight men and white men of all different sexualities have been afraid to do in public, the compulsion to appropriate his voice and to make song and video after song and video is because Antoine is saying and doing what they really wish they COULD say and do, so they say it in his voice because they are still to afraid to say what need to be said in all of our voices: RAPE IMPACTS EVERYONE AND MUST STOP NOW!
Well said Fallon W. Well said. Keep exposing the cow dung, sista.
The one thing I keep thinking as I watch white dude after white dude make Antoine’s words and Kelly’s experience into a youtube diversion for their friends, is that I feel like masculinity, white masculinity in particular, but masculinity in general has been “punked” by Antoine Dodson. And not to say anyone has been tricked in any way, but to say that maybe the need to attack Antoine’s queerness, comes from shame and not being as brave as Antoine is. At not standing up for their sisters, collectively…i.e US. Because as you point out, he done something that I have NEVER seen a man do, which is to speak out passionately AGAINST RAPE on TV. (And if someone reading this has seen that on TV please YouTube me that.) Maybe that is something the code of masculinity forbids, because they know as well as we do that without the threat of violent domination the world as we know it would change forever and patriarchy couldn’t hold onto its pseudo power. Antoine shows a version what a powerful person actually looks like. And how scary is that for people holding onto fake power?
AND maybe because Antoine has so eloquently and passionately done something that other men, straight men and white men of all different sexualities have been afraid to do in public, the compulsion to appropriate his voice and to make song and video after song and video is because Antoine is saying and doing what they really wish they COULD say and do, so they say it in his voice because they are still to afraid to say what need to be said in all of our voices: RAPE IMPACTS EVERYONE AND MUST STOP NOW!
should say “he did something that I have never seen any man do…” See how passionate this gets me? 🙂
should say “he did something that I have never seen any man do…” See how passionate this gets me? 🙂
@Lex,
Well said sis. I could not agree more with you. I could not agree more that Antoine’s voice challenged conventional hegemonic masculinity in the sense that his voice speaks against oppression, exploitation, and domination of not only his sister, but of children, of wives, and of husbands. And that, “perhaps” the parody borderline racist/homophobic usage of his words is a way if not a less critical way to deal with the consequences of upholding a masculinity that is based on dominance.
Well said sis, well said.
@Lex,
Well said sis. I could not agree more with you. I could not agree more that Antoine’s voice challenged conventional hegemonic masculinity in the sense that his voice speaks against oppression, exploitation, and domination of not only his sister, but of children, of wives, and of husbands. And that, “perhaps” the parody borderline racist/homophobic usage of his words is a way if not a less critical way to deal with the consequences of upholding a masculinity that is based on dominance.
Well said sis, well said.
Girrrrrrrrrrrrrl.
First of all you make me feel LESS crazy, and that is awesome sauce for a Black woman.
#ummhmm. I had heard of the video but I ain’t know what they were talking about until you broke it down. #ummhmm.
Thank you.
~Renina
Girrrrrrrrrrrrrl.
First of all you make me feel LESS crazy, and that is awesome sauce for a Black woman.
#ummhmm. I had heard of the video but I ain’t know what they were talking about until you broke it down. #ummhmm.
Thank you.
~Renina
obviously the man is not the most eloquent speaker, but any person with an ounce of compassion and human decency could understand that he was outraged over what happened to his sister. So maybe the creep did not have sex with her, but he intended to, which is reason enough to be angry. how can that many people hear their story and not empathize with a woman who was violated? how did the message get so distorted in translation?
had the victim been a white woman of the same age, even the same economic class, I wonder how she would have been portrayed, and if that song ever would have been made.
I am outraged, but I appreciate your highlighting this topic.
obviously the man is not the most eloquent speaker, but any person with an ounce of compassion and human decency could understand that he was outraged over what happened to his sister. So maybe the creep did not have sex with her, but he intended to, which is reason enough to be angry. how can that many people hear their story and not empathize with a woman who was violated? how did the message get so distorted in translation?
had the victim been a white woman of the same age, even the same economic class, I wonder how she would have been portrayed, and if that song ever would have been made.
I am outraged, but I appreciate your highlighting this topic.
Not only do I, as an educated black male, firmly disagree with a fair portion of this piece in the first place, but a number of its salient points are now moot in light of developments that were not brought to light until recently.
The Gregory Brothers did attempt to contact the Dodson family to donate proceeds. They have set up a means to do that now (Splitting money on iTunes sales with the higher portion going to the Dodson family), and they have put together an extended version with unaired footage from the original news video in which Antoine describes the attempted rapist, part of a concentrated effort to catch the perpetrator. Countless other groups on the internet have come out with donation funds for rape centers in Alabama, t-shirt lines to fund both Antoine’s family and a charity of his choice have come about, and I’m sure there are other movements made that I’m even unaware of at this point.
The comedy inherent in the whole thing is not because Antoine is a black man or because he lives in the projects or because he’s fulfilling some stereotype. It’s because his delivery comes with such drastic hyperbole and ostentation. It’s the exact same effect that ‘viralized’ the most recent Gregory Brothers hit prior to this one – the Double Rainbow phenomenon (Look it up if you don’t know what it is). I understand that there are two particular sensitivities in this situation that were absent from that one – the fact that it’s a black man and the fact that the crime was attempted rape. If you’ve ever watched a Gregory Brothers video, ever really, you’d realize rather quickly that they are both colorblind and do not discriminate what issues are ‘taboo’ to parody and which are not.
Antoine is an admirable figure in the whole thing, not just because he yelled exaggerated claims at a local news camera about an attempted rape, but because he took the remixes and parodies with a big smile and now is leveraging it to make the most of it.
So are you really now going to claim that the Dodsons lives are not changed for the better because of this? The only difference between them and every other viral phenomenon is that they were smart enough to take advantage of it.
Not only do I, as an educated black male, firmly disagree with a fair portion of this piece in the first place, but a number of its salient points are now moot in light of developments that were not brought to light until recently.
The Gregory Brothers did attempt to contact the Dodson family to donate proceeds. They have set up a means to do that now (Splitting money on iTunes sales with the higher portion going to the Dodson family), and they have put together an extended version with unaired footage from the original news video in which Antoine describes the attempted rapist, part of a concentrated effort to catch the perpetrator. Countless other groups on the internet have come out with donation funds for rape centers in Alabama, t-shirt lines to fund both Antoine’s family and a charity of his choice have come about, and I’m sure there are other movements made that I’m even unaware of at this point.
The comedy inherent in the whole thing is not because Antoine is a black man or because he lives in the projects or because he’s fulfilling some stereotype. It’s because his delivery comes with such drastic hyperbole and ostentation. It’s the exact same effect that ‘viralized’ the most recent Gregory Brothers hit prior to this one – the Double Rainbow phenomenon (Look it up if you don’t know what it is). I understand that there are two particular sensitivities in this situation that were absent from that one – the fact that it’s a black man and the fact that the crime was attempted rape. If you’ve ever watched a Gregory Brothers video, ever really, you’d realize rather quickly that they are both colorblind and do not discriminate what issues are ‘taboo’ to parody and which are not.
Antoine is an admirable figure in the whole thing, not just because he yelled exaggerated claims at a local news camera about an attempted rape, but because he took the remixes and parodies with a big smile and now is leveraging it to make the most of it.
So are you really now going to claim that the Dodsons lives are not changed for the better because of this? The only difference between them and every other viral phenomenon is that they were smart enough to take advantage of it.
Fallon, this piece was fya!! Thanks so much for it. @Rico, it is clear that you missed the point of the critique offered here, which is that this piece capitalizes on sexual violence and sexual trauma, not for the explicit purpose of highlighting a serious issue that is a reality for all women and particularly black women, but for the sheer sake of entertainment. Moreover, the video particularly fetishizes Antoine’s performance of queer black masculinity. It matters not what other videos the Gregory Brothers have previously done. It is clear that parody is their thing; the issue is about what happens when raced and gendered bodies, which are always already seen as excessive, nonserious, stereotypical, and hyperbolic, or repackaged and represented in parodied form. Moreover, what I took Fallon to be saying is that this might have been a serious opportunity to have a conversation about the epidemic levels of rape and sexual violence that Black women experience, or an opportunity to talk about why more brothers don’t stand up for the cause. Instead, folks are passing this video around for the sake of humor and let’s be clear: for the sake of laughing at (not with) a presumed Black gay man. Furthermore, it’s interesting that you spent more time in your post defending the Gregory brothers and their colorblind politics than standing up for rape in our communities; your investment in skipping past the main point–a discussion of how we might more effectively talk about rape and sexual violence–to address what is really a minor issue says to me “educated Black man” that their might be more effective uses of your time and talents than the uses to which you have put them here.
Fallon, this piece was fya!! Thanks so much for it. @Rico, it is clear that you missed the point of the critique offered here, which is that this piece capitalizes on sexual violence and sexual trauma, not for the explicit purpose of highlighting a serious issue that is a reality for all women and particularly black women, but for the sheer sake of entertainment. Moreover, the video particularly fetishizes Antoine’s performance of queer black masculinity. It matters not what other videos the Gregory Brothers have previously done. It is clear that parody is their thing; the issue is about what happens when raced and gendered bodies, which are always already seen as excessive, nonserious, stereotypical, and hyperbolic, or repackaged and represented in parodied form. Moreover, what I took Fallon to be saying is that this might have been a serious opportunity to have a conversation about the epidemic levels of rape and sexual violence that Black women experience, or an opportunity to talk about why more brothers don’t stand up for the cause. Instead, folks are passing this video around for the sake of humor and let’s be clear: for the sake of laughing at (not with) a presumed Black gay man. Furthermore, it’s interesting that you spent more time in your post defending the Gregory brothers and their colorblind politics than standing up for rape in our communities; your investment in skipping past the main point–a discussion of how we might more effectively talk about rape and sexual violence–to address what is really a minor issue says to me “educated Black man” that their might be more effective uses of your time and talents than the uses to which you have put them here.
Thank you Fallon & Crunktastic.
The term “colorblind” always makes me cringe.
Thank you Fallon & Crunktastic.
The term “colorblind” always makes me cringe.
Thank you for calling attention to the traumatic incident at the heart of this matter. Respectfully, though, I don’t think Rico’s point should be entirely disregarded. The Antoine Dodson remixes are simulations of a performance that is mimicking the persona Dodson presented to the local TV news station (and that they edited). There are a number of participants here, including blogs that link to the material and present it in different contexts. Your post, like the NPR story, is arguably the next level of “remix,” particularly as new readers are introduced to the material and each successive level of interpretation through your writing. (Dodson may even link to this post on his new blog/Twitter feed and continue the cycle.) I’m not trying to make light of anything that you are saying here, but the web/media distances us from real lives and can make us all into spectators – whether it is this, Hurricane Katrina, Haiti, etc. Given this, I do have sympathy for those who are forwarding the links, making new parodies, and the rest. But it’s also good to be reminded of the fact that there are actual people behind the cameras and that their suffering is real.
Thank you for calling attention to the traumatic incident at the heart of this matter. Respectfully, though, I don’t think Rico’s point should be entirely disregarded. The Antoine Dodson remixes are simulations of a performance that is mimicking the persona Dodson presented to the local TV news station (and that they edited). There are a number of participants here, including blogs that link to the material and present it in different contexts. Your post, like the NPR story, is arguably the next level of “remix,” particularly as new readers are introduced to the material and each successive level of interpretation through your writing. (Dodson may even link to this post on his new blog/Twitter feed and continue the cycle.) I’m not trying to make light of anything that you are saying here, but the web/media distances us from real lives and can make us all into spectators – whether it is this, Hurricane Katrina, Haiti, etc. Given this, I do have sympathy for those who are forwarding the links, making new parodies, and the rest. But it’s also good to be reminded of the fact that there are actual people behind the cameras and that their suffering is real.
@Crunktastic – What you seem to miss is that my entire point is that this video isn’t attempting to capitalize on sexual trauma or racial/queer stereotypes, nor is it actually doing so. I don’t see what makes it difficult to understand that the attempted rape involved in the situation and Antoine’s race or sexual orientation is completely inconsequential to the video’s popularity and virality – things that this post is claiming otherwise about.
It’s not funny because of those things.
It’s not viral because of those things.
Again, Antoine’s hyperbole is the entire point and if you take that away, none of us even know about this. If you think that it provides a good pretext for having an educated discussion about rape in black communities in the first place, I think you need to look elsewhere. Wrong forum for that discussion because these things are not the intended focal point of the video (Although in an ironic twist they are becoming the focal point in a positive direction after the fact, again making this article kinda meaningless now).
It feels like there’s a victim complex and completely unrelated agenda at work here, but come on now, if you don’t yet realize how colorblind and genderblind the internet community and viral videos are by now, you need to read more into this – sounds like you’re really out of touch. Nobody cares that Antoine is a queer black man. This is why the other viral videos I alluded to are relevant – they are not popular because of the race or sexual orientation or stereotypes embodied by their starring actors, but rather because of the over-the-top presentation of their characters as *individuals*. Not as entire races or social groups.
@Crunktastic – What you seem to miss is that my entire point is that this video isn’t attempting to capitalize on sexual trauma or racial/queer stereotypes, nor is it actually doing so. I don’t see what makes it difficult to understand that the attempted rape involved in the situation and Antoine’s race or sexual orientation is completely inconsequential to the video’s popularity and virality – things that this post is claiming otherwise about.
It’s not funny because of those things.
It’s not viral because of those things.
Again, Antoine’s hyperbole is the entire point and if you take that away, none of us even know about this. If you think that it provides a good pretext for having an educated discussion about rape in black communities in the first place, I think you need to look elsewhere. Wrong forum for that discussion because these things are not the intended focal point of the video (Although in an ironic twist they are becoming the focal point in a positive direction after the fact, again making this article kinda meaningless now).
It feels like there’s a victim complex and completely unrelated agenda at work here, but come on now, if you don’t yet realize how colorblind and genderblind the internet community and viral videos are by now, you need to read more into this – sounds like you’re really out of touch. Nobody cares that Antoine is a queer black man. This is why the other viral videos I alluded to are relevant – they are not popular because of the race or sexual orientation or stereotypes embodied by their starring actors, but rather because of the over-the-top presentation of their characters as *individuals*. Not as entire races or social groups.
The author wouldn’t be getting into a sociological issue over the song if there wasn’t money involved. Otherwise, the content is only relevant on a personal level and weather one liked the content or not, or had sociological problems with it. In all other senses, the author should be angry at the mechanisms for creative media modding. Which, in America, is copyright law under fair use and capitalist profit on the copyright law if someone chooses.
Also, the modding and re-distribution with credit to original producers is only even more encouraged under copyleft, the GNU license, etc. So again, if one wants to criticize using sociological language on the content of mods, fine, but otherwise, get angry at the capitalist system towards any kind of product, regardless of the content, if one doesn’t like the monetary exploitation of such modding.
Otherwise I doubt you would criticize, on a content-level, if someone auto-tuned a rich politician and their social situation in a disrespectful way, and if that song got enough popularity to be released on i-Tunes for profit (thus exploiting their social status as a rich politician with some problem that may be symptomatic of politicians as a group). So, again, regardless of content, regardless of which group it exploits, one should aim sociological critique at the system which can be used to gain profit from all kinds of content, based on real events or not, and in this case the Dodsons are at least getting some money, even though they should be getting all the proceeds.
The author wouldn’t be getting into a sociological issue over the song if there wasn’t money involved. Otherwise, the content is only relevant on a personal level and weather one liked the content or not, or had sociological problems with it. In all other senses, the author should be angry at the mechanisms for creative media modding. Which, in America, is copyright law under fair use and capitalist profit on the copyright law if someone chooses.
Also, the modding and re-distribution with credit to original producers is only even more encouraged under copyleft, the GNU license, etc. So again, if one wants to criticize using sociological language on the content of mods, fine, but otherwise, get angry at the capitalist system towards any kind of product, regardless of the content, if one doesn’t like the monetary exploitation of such modding.
Otherwise I doubt you would criticize, on a content-level, if someone auto-tuned a rich politician and their social situation in a disrespectful way, and if that song got enough popularity to be released on i-Tunes for profit (thus exploiting their social status as a rich politician with some problem that may be symptomatic of politicians as a group). So, again, regardless of content, regardless of which group it exploits, one should aim sociological critique at the system which can be used to gain profit from all kinds of content, based on real events or not, and in this case the Dodsons are at least getting some money, even though they should be getting all the proceeds.
I don’t think you know what sexual assault is. she was attacked physically, but it was physical assault(he put his hands around her neck, that’s it). So no, she was not raped or sexually violated, she was physically violated.
I don’t think you know what sexual assault is. she was attacked physically, but it was physical assault(he put his hands around her neck, that’s it). So no, she was not raped or sexually violated, she was physically violated.
is there a difference btn sexual harassment and physical assault with a sole intetion of sexual violence?
is there a difference btn sexual harassment and physical assault with a sole intetion of sexual violence?
@Rico, actually it seems that I got your point quite well. If you choose to be so naive to think that Antoine is seen as hyperbolic solely based upon the notion of hyperbole as pure category, so be it. Loads of scholarship discusses the ways in which Black, female, and queer bodies are seen as excessive and hyperbolic by their very “nature.” At this point your argument comes down to, it was simple colorblind hyperbole, nothing more, nothing less. But the work of Patricia Hill Collins, Kimberly Wallace-Sanders, Ben Reiss and others backs up my claims to the n-th degree. Check ’em out. Moreover, your erroneous belief that this has nothing to do with Antoine’s presumed queerness suggests your investment in a politics of the blind –colorblindness, queerblindness and class-blindness that cannot be addressed in the space of a blog comment.
Chris, your attempt to flip the script and accuse Fallon of being invested in a critique solely because of money is an epic failure of good, solid logic. Black women and Black queer people are mired in troubling representations in ways that always render us entertainment worthy even when we are clearly the victims of violence. You obviously have no sense of Fallon’s long-standing commitment to the plight of Black women, Black communities, and issues of representation, and since you don’t know, maybe you should spend some time researching her other posts, before you arrogantly presume to dismiss her for false motives. That type of argumentative position, Sir, calls your own motives supremely into question. Let us be clear that this is not comparable to the random auto-tuning of a politician. This is about very specific politics of race, class, sexuality and gender. It is about the fact that newmedia gets much of its ratings from showing at least one ranting/raving Black person in the projects on every newscast, because this plays into our societal need to see poor Black folks as societal deviants and to laugh away any investments we might otherwise have in social change for the sake of a bit of entertainment. The issue here is that a Black woman was the victim of violence, and that her brother stood up and spoke out for her. And instead of thinking through all the ways in which this matters in a critical way, he’s the latest fad in autotuning. Be colorblind about it if you want, but the operative word here is blind– ignorant, intentional, and insidious blindness.
And David, your assertions are the most problematic of all. You really think the intruder got into bed with this woman for the sole purpose of “physically” but not “sexually assaulting” her. And what is the implication of this distinction? Is physical assault less important? More to the point, your utter myopic inability to see the sexual dimensions of this issue reflects the original point of Fallon’s post more than any other. When we are dealing with Black women and violence, we can see humor, in the absence of seeing anything else. Even when this was clearly sexual assault (even if was not rape), you are unwilling to concede the validity of that experience. This goes back to a long-standing historical discourse that is incapable of seeing Black women, particularly poor Black women as being potential victims. And you, sir, are the latest person to fall for and then ignorantly perpetuate the okey doke.
Clearly, critical thinking is high demand and low supply these days. Come on guys, y’all can do better.
@Rico, actually it seems that I got your point quite well. If you choose to be so naive to think that Antoine is seen as hyperbolic solely based upon the notion of hyperbole as pure category, so be it. Loads of scholarship discusses the ways in which Black, female, and queer bodies are seen as excessive and hyperbolic by their very “nature.” At this point your argument comes down to, it was simple colorblind hyperbole, nothing more, nothing less. But the work of Patricia Hill Collins, Kimberly Wallace-Sanders, Ben Reiss and others backs up my claims to the n-th degree. Check ’em out. Moreover, your erroneous belief that this has nothing to do with Antoine’s presumed queerness suggests your investment in a politics of the blind –colorblindness, queerblindness and class-blindness that cannot be addressed in the space of a blog comment.
Chris, your attempt to flip the script and accuse Fallon of being invested in a critique solely because of money is an epic failure of good, solid logic. Black women and Black queer people are mired in troubling representations in ways that always render us entertainment worthy even when we are clearly the victims of violence. You obviously have no sense of Fallon’s long-standing commitment to the plight of Black women, Black communities, and issues of representation, and since you don’t know, maybe you should spend some time researching her other posts, before you arrogantly presume to dismiss her for false motives. That type of argumentative position, Sir, calls your own motives supremely into question. Let us be clear that this is not comparable to the random auto-tuning of a politician. This is about very specific politics of race, class, sexuality and gender. It is about the fact that newmedia gets much of its ratings from showing at least one ranting/raving Black person in the projects on every newscast, because this plays into our societal need to see poor Black folks as societal deviants and to laugh away any investments we might otherwise have in social change for the sake of a bit of entertainment. The issue here is that a Black woman was the victim of violence, and that her brother stood up and spoke out for her. And instead of thinking through all the ways in which this matters in a critical way, he’s the latest fad in autotuning. Be colorblind about it if you want, but the operative word here is blind– ignorant, intentional, and insidious blindness.
And David, your assertions are the most problematic of all. You really think the intruder got into bed with this woman for the sole purpose of “physically” but not “sexually assaulting” her. And what is the implication of this distinction? Is physical assault less important? More to the point, your utter myopic inability to see the sexual dimensions of this issue reflects the original point of Fallon’s post more than any other. When we are dealing with Black women and violence, we can see humor, in the absence of seeing anything else. Even when this was clearly sexual assault (even if was not rape), you are unwilling to concede the validity of that experience. This goes back to a long-standing historical discourse that is incapable of seeing Black women, particularly poor Black women as being potential victims. And you, sir, are the latest person to fall for and then ignorantly perpetuate the okey doke.
Clearly, critical thinking is high demand and low supply these days. Come on guys, y’all can do better.
Fallon, thank you for writing this. As entire offices make the autotune song their ringtone and Dodson embraces the internet fame, I wonder about ripple effects, and lasting effects.
In response to Rico’s point on colorblindness:
“If you’ve ever watched a Gregory Brothers video, ever really, you’d realize rather quickly that they are both colorblind and do not discriminate what issues are ‘taboo’ to parody and which are not.”
Rico, Colorblindess as a concept is a fantasy. No one is truly blind of race, class, gender and sexuality and we should not pretend to ignore or dismiss these identities. These identities should be valued and this means we must recognize and understand them and take them seriously, not make them into minstrel shows for entertainment.
The Gregory Brothers’ are creative individuals and I am a fan of some of their prior autotune the news videos. However, your assertion that they do “not discriminate” what issues to parody is a mistake on their part, and I hope they choose more wisely in the future.
I also want to respond to your question above:
“So are you really now going to claim that the Dodsons lives are not changed for the better because of this? The only difference between them and every other viral phenomenon is that they were smart enough to take advantage of it.”
Do you really think Dodson had much of a choice to embrace this?
And you suggest that this mockery benefits Dodson. And it does appear that Dodson will benefit monetarilly. However, this is not where the dialogue should end because clearly this is bigger than Dodson as an individual, internet celebrity.
Many of us are concerned with the motives and implications of this mockery. How does this autotune song and subsequent commercialism (t-shirts, mugs, dolls, etc.) reinforce the idea that at the end of the day, Dodson (and his black queer identity) is laughable? How does this spectacle reinforce the idea that queerness is synonymous with comedy and should not be taken seriously? That sexual assault is laughable?
This spectacle illuminates how the media and greater society devalues poor, queer, people of color. It is acceptable to exploit this demographic, and this is a problem.
You seem to imply that exploitation is excusable when those who are exploited, (mocked, profited off of) also benefit. Is this an accurate interpretation? Or are you willing to suggest that no one is being exploited here?
Fallon, thank you for writing this. As entire offices make the autotune song their ringtone and Dodson embraces the internet fame, I wonder about ripple effects, and lasting effects.
In response to Rico’s point on colorblindness:
“If you’ve ever watched a Gregory Brothers video, ever really, you’d realize rather quickly that they are both colorblind and do not discriminate what issues are ‘taboo’ to parody and which are not.”
Rico, Colorblindess as a concept is a fantasy. No one is truly blind of race, class, gender and sexuality and we should not pretend to ignore or dismiss these identities. These identities should be valued and this means we must recognize and understand them and take them seriously, not make them into minstrel shows for entertainment.
The Gregory Brothers’ are creative individuals and I am a fan of some of their prior autotune the news videos. However, your assertion that they do “not discriminate” what issues to parody is a mistake on their part, and I hope they choose more wisely in the future.
I also want to respond to your question above:
“So are you really now going to claim that the Dodsons lives are not changed for the better because of this? The only difference between them and every other viral phenomenon is that they were smart enough to take advantage of it.”
Do you really think Dodson had much of a choice to embrace this?
And you suggest that this mockery benefits Dodson. And it does appear that Dodson will benefit monetarilly. However, this is not where the dialogue should end because clearly this is bigger than Dodson as an individual, internet celebrity.
Many of us are concerned with the motives and implications of this mockery. How does this autotune song and subsequent commercialism (t-shirts, mugs, dolls, etc.) reinforce the idea that at the end of the day, Dodson (and his black queer identity) is laughable? How does this spectacle reinforce the idea that queerness is synonymous with comedy and should not be taken seriously? That sexual assault is laughable?
This spectacle illuminates how the media and greater society devalues poor, queer, people of color. It is acceptable to exploit this demographic, and this is a problem.
You seem to imply that exploitation is excusable when those who are exploited, (mocked, profited off of) also benefit. Is this an accurate interpretation? Or are you willing to suggest that no one is being exploited here?
thank you Fallon, Lex, Crunktastic and Bravebird for these responses. i have nothing to add other than the fact that i am in solidarity with you all for your dedication against forms of violence (and violence is always sexualized) and normative representations of black women and queerfolks in media…
thank you Fallon, Lex, Crunktastic and Bravebird for these responses. i have nothing to add other than the fact that i am in solidarity with you all for your dedication against forms of violence (and violence is always sexualized) and normative representations of black women and queerfolks in media…
Oh you need to get over it. If you had done your research you would have figured out that this is not the only video that this guy has done – so he is not picking on poor black folks. If it were a white family you wouldn’t have typed two words about it. The victims are superstars now and they aren’t complaining. If they aren’t complaining, then why should you? I’ve been the victim of a rape so I understand what it feels like, but I laughed at the way he turned the story around into a catchy tune. It feels good to laugh sometime, but maybe you don’t know anything about that if you are always so doggone serious.
Oh you need to get over it. If you had done your research you would have figured out that this is not the only video that this guy has done – so he is not picking on poor black folks. If it were a white family you wouldn’t have typed two words about it. The victims are superstars now and they aren’t complaining. If they aren’t complaining, then why should you? I’ve been the victim of a rape so I understand what it feels like, but I laughed at the way he turned the story around into a catchy tune. It feels good to laugh sometime, but maybe you don’t know anything about that if you are always so doggone serious.
I admittedly had very mixed and even contradictory reactions to the original news piece as well as the viraled remix that I won’t take up space here to detail. All I will say for now is that I find attempts to dismiss concerns about the violence against Kelly Dodson absolutely insensitive and ludicrous. I ask you to imagine if a woman you loved were in Kelly Dodson’s position how you might feel if someone suggested to you that, “Oh, she was JUST assaulted.” If this were your sister, wife, mother, daughter, etc., would that kind of hair-splitting sit well with you? Would that console you? If you had fended off an intruder in your home, and someone told you, “Yeah, well, at least she didn’t get raped,” would that make you laugh and say, “True, true!” Those kinds of rationalization feeds into the cultural mindset that allows violence such as this to perpetuate.
I admittedly had very mixed and even contradictory reactions to the original news piece as well as the viraled remix that I won’t take up space here to detail. All I will say for now is that I find attempts to dismiss concerns about the violence against Kelly Dodson absolutely insensitive and ludicrous. I ask you to imagine if a woman you loved were in Kelly Dodson’s position how you might feel if someone suggested to you that, “Oh, she was JUST assaulted.” If this were your sister, wife, mother, daughter, etc., would that kind of hair-splitting sit well with you? Would that console you? If you had fended off an intruder in your home, and someone told you, “Yeah, well, at least she didn’t get raped,” would that make you laugh and say, “True, true!” Those kinds of rationalization feeds into the cultural mindset that allows violence such as this to perpetuate.
The most laughable thing about this matter is the suggestion that the internet is some kind of democratized space free of “isms.” That myth still has traction in 2010? Anyone who believes that should divert some of the time spent watching YouTube into taking a basic course in media literacy.
The most laughable thing about this matter is the suggestion that the internet is some kind of democratized space free of “isms.” That myth still has traction in 2010? Anyone who believes that should divert some of the time spent watching YouTube into taking a basic course in media literacy.
[…] Sherrod, Antoine D, The Tea Party, bigoted churches, are all evidence in a case we are continually trying to prove, […]
[…] Sherrod, Antoine D, The Tea Party, bigoted churches, are all evidence in a case we are continually trying to prove, […]
Good article Fallon.
Rape is wrong and making a song about it isn’t right. But The Gregory Brothers version has a good beat to it. Still its a wrong topic to make a song or parody about.
Good article Fallon.
Rape is wrong and making a song about it isn’t right. But The Gregory Brothers version has a good beat to it. Still its a wrong topic to make a song or parody about.
Good article Fallon.
Rape is wrong and making a song about it isn’t right. But The Gregory Brothers version has a good beat to it. Still though you are right. It is a wrong topic to make a song or parody about.
Good article Fallon.
Rape is wrong and making a song about it isn’t right. But The Gregory Brothers version has a good beat to it. Still though you are right. It is a wrong topic to make a song or parody about.
I’ve enjoyed reading about/watching the turn of events for Antoine Dodson and his family (and the Gregory Bros. – AutoTune-In-The-News is HILARIOUS). I’ve actually only been perturbed by comments by some Black folk (I’m Black so I’m allowed by law, constitutional amendments, and the Oprah Winfrey book club rules to toss such terms around); especially when terms THEY’VE tossed around include “embarrassment” and “minstrelsy.” Minstrelsy? Really? Why?
Was the headscarf wearing representative of minstrelsy?
If the wearing of head-scarves denoted minstrelsy, then 75% of our people could wear that label…we don’t ALL have “Indian” in our family…just sayin’.
Was it his wearing of a headscarf during the interview?
Perhaps those of you shaking your head at that action would assert that after an attempted sexual assault of one’s family member, any reasonable person would find the nearest curling iron and flat-iron, or simply refuse to aid in identifying a would-be sexual predator.
Those finger wagging members of the Black Bourgeoisie should be reminded of how frequently crimes against African-Americans aren’t given equal time by the media; they should be reminded of how a White woman’s stolen wonder-bra gets more news coverage than so many crimes and injustices against Black people; of how the media is seemingly unaware that OUR Black children disappear TOO, OUR Black women are assaulted TOO (guess they’re too busy extrapolating details on Nancy Grace about what happened to some poor White lady 11 months ago…to that end, does Nancy Grace know we have Black people in this country?…I’ve never seen her discuss any during her show…just sayin’). In reality, the poorest of us are often treated as the least of us, and unfortunately, being poor AND Black in is often tantamount to being invisible in today’s media (unless you’re the perpetrator).
So, again I ask… minstrelsy? Neither Antoine Dodson nor his sister spewed expletives, double-negatives or (intentional) rap lyrics during the interview. They answered the questions about the incident clearly and concisely, while managing to do something even the Congressional Black Caucus, Al Sharpton or his hair-dresser have been unable to do: in a largely White, southern community, he got the media to report on crime AGAINST an African-American family.
I’m a middle class Black woman living/working in the D.C. Metro Area, and a native of the 9th ward in New Orleans. And while I’ve achieved financial/career success, I don’t suffer from any delusions about where I come from (which included the Florida Housing Projects for six years during my childhood). I don’t suffer any form of amnesia regarding what it is to struggle, or what it’s like when you’re just trying to make it from day to day/get by.
That said, I’m pleased and proud that Antoine Dodson was able to speak his mind, get his story out, and—after other people promulgated his story in the media—had the intelligence to take actions which have allowed both he and his family to benefit from it.
To all the bourgeois, elite, pseudo-intellectual, probably-speak-with-fake-British-accents-even-though-they-don’t-have-passport Black folks out there looking down on a brother who is representative of so many, the only embarrassing response has been YOURS.
I’ve enjoyed reading about/watching the turn of events for Antoine Dodson and his family (and the Gregory Bros. – AutoTune-In-The-News is HILARIOUS). I’ve actually only been perturbed by comments by some Black folk (I’m Black so I’m allowed by law, constitutional amendments, and the Oprah Winfrey book club rules to toss such terms around); especially when terms THEY’VE tossed around include “embarrassment” and “minstrelsy.” Minstrelsy? Really? Why?
Was the headscarf wearing representative of minstrelsy?
If the wearing of head-scarves denoted minstrelsy, then 75% of our people could wear that label…we don’t ALL have “Indian” in our family…just sayin’.
Was it his wearing of a headscarf during the interview?
Perhaps those of you shaking your head at that action would assert that after an attempted sexual assault of one’s family member, any reasonable person would find the nearest curling iron and flat-iron, or simply refuse to aid in identifying a would-be sexual predator.
Those finger wagging members of the Black Bourgeoisie should be reminded of how frequently crimes against African-Americans aren’t given equal time by the media; they should be reminded of how a White woman’s stolen wonder-bra gets more news coverage than so many crimes and injustices against Black people; of how the media is seemingly unaware that OUR Black children disappear TOO, OUR Black women are assaulted TOO (guess they’re too busy extrapolating details on Nancy Grace about what happened to some poor White lady 11 months ago…to that end, does Nancy Grace know we have Black people in this country?…I’ve never seen her discuss any during her show…just sayin’). In reality, the poorest of us are often treated as the least of us, and unfortunately, being poor AND Black in is often tantamount to being invisible in today’s media (unless you’re the perpetrator).
So, again I ask… minstrelsy? Neither Antoine Dodson nor his sister spewed expletives, double-negatives or (intentional) rap lyrics during the interview. They answered the questions about the incident clearly and concisely, while managing to do something even the Congressional Black Caucus, Al Sharpton or his hair-dresser have been unable to do: in a largely White, southern community, he got the media to report on crime AGAINST an African-American family.
I’m a middle class Black woman living/working in the D.C. Metro Area, and a native of the 9th ward in New Orleans. And while I’ve achieved financial/career success, I don’t suffer from any delusions about where I come from (which included the Florida Housing Projects for six years during my childhood). I don’t suffer any form of amnesia regarding what it is to struggle, or what it’s like when you’re just trying to make it from day to day/get by.
That said, I’m pleased and proud that Antoine Dodson was able to speak his mind, get his story out, and—after other people promulgated his story in the media—had the intelligence to take actions which have allowed both he and his family to benefit from it.
To all the bourgeois, elite, pseudo-intellectual, probably-speak-with-fake-British-accents-even-though-they-don’t-have-passport Black folks out there looking down on a brother who is representative of so many, the only embarrassing response has been YOURS.
Was this a serious story or a satire?
Either way, you failed miserably.
I’m sorry that you don’t have a sense of humor. The reason people like Antoine is not because he’s gay -which by the way is neither here nor there and bringing it up makes you sound homophobic (plus he doesn’t sound flamboyant anyway). The reason people like him is because he’s speaking his mind and telling his real situation.
And the reason people like the music video is not because rape is funny. It’s because the perpetrator was so “dumb”. Or as you mistakenly call him “dum”. Plus a good tune is a good tune, regardless of the subject matter.
As for the Gregory Brothers, only a year ago they were an unheard of comedy troupe trying to get by in Brooklyn, not a bunch of corporate whores as you make them out to be.
Have you seen any of their other videos? Should they not Auto-tune the president because politics is serious business? Or not Auto-tune the UN because they’ll be making light of a complex system of non-binding international regulations?
You should quit watching Youtube and go read the First Amendment.
Was this a serious story or a satire?
Either way, you failed miserably.
I’m sorry that you don’t have a sense of humor. The reason people like Antoine is not because he’s gay -which by the way is neither here nor there and bringing it up makes you sound homophobic (plus he doesn’t sound flamboyant anyway). The reason people like him is because he’s speaking his mind and telling his real situation.
And the reason people like the music video is not because rape is funny. It’s because the perpetrator was so “dumb”. Or as you mistakenly call him “dum”. Plus a good tune is a good tune, regardless of the subject matter.
As for the Gregory Brothers, only a year ago they were an unheard of comedy troupe trying to get by in Brooklyn, not a bunch of corporate whores as you make them out to be.
Have you seen any of their other videos? Should they not Auto-tune the president because politics is serious business? Or not Auto-tune the UN because they’ll be making light of a complex system of non-binding international regulations?
You should quit watching Youtube and go read the First Amendment.
Hello, I was sitting here at my law office and came across your site when searching on Google. Just wanted to say sweet!, and as a business lawyer I hope my blog can be as informative as yours.
Hello, I was sitting here at my law office and came across your site when searching on Google. Just wanted to say sweet!, and as a business lawyer I hope my blog can be as informative as yours.
This video is hella funny you need to chill out. Stop trashing your time and do somthing good with it like get a bf
This video is hella funny you need to chill out. Stop trashing your time and do somthing good with it like get a bf