Today in Post-Race History: Say it Ain't Sosa
We’ve seen the Sammy Sosa picture(s) by now. The Michael Jackson jokes are stale and unimaginative. So I won’t make any here. Yet as a black blogger, I guess I have to say something. So I will mention just a couple of things. This is a mere sketch. Would love it if you all would fill-in and/or correct me.
Interestingly, to me at least, a few days before the Sammy Sosa photos surfed every wave of the internet, NPR’s Weekend Edition ran a story about Blended Nation, a new book of photographs and interviews about people who identify as mixed race.
The 2000 U.S. census was the first to give Americans the option to check more than one box for race. Nearly 7 million people declared themselves to be multiracial that year, a number that’s expected to shoot up in the 2010 count. As more of the nation’s population identifies itself as being of mixed race, the authors of a new book say Americans’ traditional ideas of racial identity are in for a challenge.
Folks, especially mixed race advocates (see Maria P.P. Root, for example), would like a story like this; they often highlight the increasing presence of multiracial people (and recognizing them as such) as part of the rubric for more pleasant and healthier (future) race relations. The argument being, of course, that seeing more interracial couples and/or bi and multiracial people will make Americans more racially tolerant. Plus, eventually all that blending will make everybody brown anyway. (I’m not going to get into all the problematic biological, racial purity, etc. stuff here, but feel free to mention it in the comments section.) So, racial rigidity gives way to racial fluidity and everybody’s happy, right? Racism is dying! Yay!
The expert NPR consulted for the story, Alan Goodman adds, “I think the real change that is taking place [is] in the way people think about themselves[.]” I guess so. There will definitely be a lot more hyphens involved. But I’m not entirely sure that that’s a good thing.
Here we have Sammy Sosa, native son of the Dominican Republic, a place–nearly 75% multiracial–with a more varied, fluid racial stratification system than the United States, bleaching his “sun damaged” skin, still rocking that (very unimpressive) conk and a thinner nose. (His rhinoplasty is Halle Berry-esque. Look closely.)
This is what wikipedia (and wiki never lies) has to say about the DR’s racial problems:
A recent U.N. envoy in October of 2007 found racism against blacks in general – and Hatians in particular – to be rampant in every segment of Dominican society. According to a study by the CUNY Dominican Studies Institute, about 90% of the contemporary Dominican population has West African ancestry to varying degrees. However, most Dominicans do not self-identify as black, in contrast to people of West African ancestry in other countries. A variety of terms are used to represent a range of skintones, such as morena (brown), canela (red/brown) [“cinnamon”], India (Indian), blanca oscura (dark white), and trigueño (literally “wheat colored”, which is the English equivalent of olive skin), among others.
If this potentially blended nation follows the example of the DR and other parts of Latin America, then it seems to me that what results isn’t necessarily a more accepting society, but rather nomenclature that allows one to move away from blackness. This, in my estimation, does not undermine or eliminate, but reinvigorates societal structures that rely on denigrating blackness. Hypodescent sucks. And this might just mean that more folks won’t have to deal with it anymore. So how much hope should we have for our future blended nation? When I look at Sammy Sosa, I’m not comfortable with this “new” model.
In other words, fluid racial categories did nothing to stop the cultivation of Sammy Sosa’s internalized racism, his aversion to blackness. To add, the presence of a multiracial population perhaps gives us the illusion that we’ve moved on from our anxieties about being associated with blackness, lures us into the comfort of believing we’ve overcome–making discourses on race reactionary, passe, and simply a headache–and Sammy Sosa just ends up being a weirdo. Though a blended nation might seem nice, it really does nothing to advance critical and honest conversations about race that need to be had for a less bleak racial future. We’re still left with the residue of blackness on our hands, and washing it off or pretending it isn’t (wasn’t in Sammy’s case) there are not viable options, especially for old school Negroes such as m’self.
Sometimes Charles Barkley says dumb things, but I still love him:
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZVuYizG-fE
Have at it.
why does charles barkly just run off at the mouth
why does charles barkly just run off at the mouth
Light skinned people are always found more attractive.
Light skinned people are always found more attractive.
@christian: i dunno, but i kind of love him for it.
@leo: does that always have to be the case? do you think we can work towards dismantling such hierarchies of color so the sammy sosas of the world aren’t delusionally pleased with such results?
@christian: i dunno, but i kind of love him for it.
@leo: does that always have to be the case? do you think we can work towards dismantling such hierarchies of color so the sammy sosas of the world aren’t delusionally pleased with such results?
He definitely looks like the Count from Sesame Street. But Charles Barkley wasn’t stopped because he was driving while Black. it definitely had more to do with the blow-job he was receiving but i digress.
i really, really enjoy your commentaries on this so-called post-racial society. There is a lot more that needs to be hashed out when it comes to race in this country. The continued discussion should include the reason Blackness is associated with laziness, filth, destitution, etc. and the fact that we continue to think that light is right. This quote resonated with me: “Though a blended nation might seem nice, it really does nothing to advance critical and honest conversations about race that need to be had for a less bleak racial future.”
In short: you right!!!
He definitely looks like the Count from Sesame Street. But Charles Barkley wasn’t stopped because he was driving while Black. it definitely had more to do with the blow-job he was receiving but i digress.
i really, really enjoy your commentaries on this so-called post-racial society. There is a lot more that needs to be hashed out when it comes to race in this country. The continued discussion should include the reason Blackness is associated with laziness, filth, destitution, etc. and the fact that we continue to think that light is right. This quote resonated with me: “Though a blended nation might seem nice, it really does nothing to advance critical and honest conversations about race that need to be had for a less bleak racial future.”
In short: you right!!!
@tamara: ohmygod, dude, he totally looks like the count from sesame street! (i’m counting bleaching cream bottles as i type. three! three bleaching creams a-ha-ha-ha!!!! bats flying, thunder, you get it.)
anyway, i definitely agree with your list of things that need to be included in this discussion. addressing all the things you mentioned is so very necessary.
thanks.
@tamara: ohmygod, dude, he totally looks like the count from sesame street! (i’m counting bleaching cream bottles as i type. three! three bleaching creams a-ha-ha-ha!!!! bats flying, thunder, you get it.)
anyway, i definitely agree with your list of things that need to be included in this discussion. addressing all the things you mentioned is so very necessary.
thanks.
While I agree with what my abuela(grandmother) used to say, “la vida es para reír o llorar(life is for laughing or crying),”I don’t know which to do when reading the jokes on Sammy. In my experience as an Afro-Puerto Rican, being called trigueño has always been about denying Blackness. It came along with thanks that my hair wasn’t as “bad” as my father’s, that my nose wasn’t as broad, that “gracias a Dios no salió demasiado negro como su padre”(thank god you didn’t come out too Black like your father). Multiraciality or fluidity is not what you’d find when you looked at hard data on life expectancy, infant mortality, or income and educational attainment in the DR, PR, Brazil, or any of the other places that are “beyond” racial binaries.
Skin bleaching and conking are way more prevalent in “multiracial” societies than you would think. So-called racial fluidity is more often than not accompanied by incredibly brutal institutional racism, especially those countries/colonies I named. Any such so called racial fluidity is just as apt to lead to more “racial self hatred,” especially in cases where specifically Black political projects are seen as divisive or hostile to the nation.
In the case of Sammy’s home the D.R., the government literally slaughtered tens of thousands of unarmed men women and children in 1937, because they were “Hatian” and living on the “non-Black” side of a river. The Massacre was incredibly racialized and presided over by then president Trujillo, a notorious eugenicist and racist. The
message was clear black lives are worthless.
It’s institutional racism, whether in societies that espouse hypodecendancy or not, that ultimately leads to examples like Sammy.
Just my thoughts,
J
p.s love the blog!!!!!!
While I agree with what my abuela(grandmother) used to say, “la vida es para reír o llorar(life is for laughing or crying),”I don’t know which to do when reading the jokes on Sammy. In my experience as an Afro-Puerto Rican, being called trigueño has always been about denying Blackness. It came along with thanks that my hair wasn’t as “bad” as my father’s, that my nose wasn’t as broad, that “gracias a Dios no salió demasiado negro como su padre”(thank god you didn’t come out too Black like your father). Multiraciality or fluidity is not what you’d find when you looked at hard data on life expectancy, infant mortality, or income and educational attainment in the DR, PR, Brazil, or any of the other places that are “beyond” racial binaries.
Skin bleaching and conking are way more prevalent in “multiracial” societies than you would think. So-called racial fluidity is more often than not accompanied by incredibly brutal institutional racism, especially those countries/colonies I named. Any such so called racial fluidity is just as apt to lead to more “racial self hatred,” especially in cases where specifically Black political projects are seen as divisive or hostile to the nation.
In the case of Sammy’s home the D.R., the government literally slaughtered tens of thousands of unarmed men women and children in 1937, because they were “Hatian” and living on the “non-Black” side of a river. The Massacre was incredibly racialized and presided over by then president Trujillo, a notorious eugenicist and racist. The
message was clear black lives are worthless.
It’s institutional racism, whether in societies that espouse hypodecendancy or not, that ultimately leads to examples like Sammy.
Just my thoughts,
J
p.s love the blog!!!!!!
Nice blog. We don’t need a post-racial society. We need a post-racist society. Let’s handle one thing at a time please? We have a legacy of racialized slavery, colonization, and illegal expropriation of land resources. This is how we got to today’s world. Any conception of the person and of the society that glides over these hard historical facts should not be trusted.
@Leo, you are wrong. If you were right there could be no relationships between people of different skin tones. There are many examples of lighter skinned people choosing people darker than themselves.
Nice blog. We don’t need a post-racial society. We need a post-racist society. Let’s handle one thing at a time please? We have a legacy of racialized slavery, colonization, and illegal expropriation of land resources. This is how we got to today’s world. Any conception of the person and of the society that glides over these hard historical facts should not be trusted.
@Leo, you are wrong. If you were right there could be no relationships between people of different skin tones. There are many examples of lighter skinned people choosing people darker than themselves.