Lost in Translation: A Response to 'Precious'
Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry said Precious was awesome and that everyone should go see it. Since I am the most obedient of Negroes, I saw it last Friday. If Flavor Flav is the world’s greatest hype man, this duo is officially the world’s greatest hype machine. I found Precious slightly underwhelming, uninspiring, and lacking much of what makes the novel, Push by Sapphire, so powerful. Sorry, Ms. Winfrey. I had no “A-ha!” moment.
My reaction to and assessment of the film, however, needs context. With relative ease, I could probably come up with a book list of black women’s fiction about incest–The Bluest Eye, Corregidora, etc. In other words, I have discussed, read, written, and thought about the issues the film presents visually perhaps more than the average moviegoer. So I’m willing to concede that my expectation, my threshold might have been a bit higher than the people (talking loud as hell) in front of me. Still, I think what I found troubling about the film worth mentioning. Lee Daniels & Co. had the envelope; they just didn’t push it. (Was that too heavy handed?)
A quick synopsis: It’s 1987. Precious Jones is 16 years old, illiterate, living in Harlem with her abusive mother, and pregnant with her second child by her father. The film begins with her being suspended from school, only to wind up in Each One Teach One, an alternative school where, with the help of her teacher, Ms. Rain, Precious works towards obtaining her GED, literacy, and the agency to tell her own story. Part of me thinks that Perry and Winfrey are so enthusiastic about this film because they believe the pathology articulated in the film is an inherent component of black women’s condition. But I can’t really prove that. I can only infer. Though Precious is somewhat faithful to the novel, it fails in several key ways.
First, the film lazy is at times, and doesn’t work hard enough at situating the viewer with an era that many of us forget or were too young to remember. It’s Harlem. It’s the 1980s. Crack has started to decimate black neighborhoods like Harlem. Len Bias has just died of a cocaine overdose, and the goverment has consequently changed the way drug offenders are prosecuted which, in turn, disproportionately affects blacks. The Cosby Show is the number one rated show on television, but instead the filmmakers opt to seemingly satiate their executive producer by having their main character pepper a pivotal scene with several “What would Oprah do?” lines. At other times, the film is weirdly anachronistic. Bobby Brown’s “Humpin Around,” which wasn’t released until 1992, serves as soundtrack to one of Precious’ imagined photo shoots. We see Oliver North, but that’s one of few blatant reminders of the Reagen era, and that’s unfortunate, because Precious’ mother, Mary Johnston (played by comedian Mo’Nique), would be considered a welfare queen as described by Reagan during his presidential campaign in the 1970s–an image that was reinvigorated in the 80s. I make this latter point especially because Mary and her daughter Precious–who I don’t find grotesque, as David Edelstein describes–are kinds of stereotypes. But I don’t think Sapphire, and later the filmmakers, employ these types out of laziness. Rather, I think these seemingly flat and distorted images place the work in the context of the time it was published, the 1990s, when black artists like Spike Lee and Kara Walker were using stereotypes to make a larger commentary about blackness at the end of the 20th century. But without proper contextualization, that observation can’t be made and the conversation can’t be had.
Second, though the film is faithful to the book by casting both Precious and her mother as they were described, it’s quite liberal in its portrayal of other characters, which results in several light skinned and/or mixed race characters working as Precious’ middle class saviors. For example, Ms. Rain is described in the book as having dark skin and dreadlocks. In the film however, she’s portrayed by Paula Patton, who not only gives Precious the gift of literacy, but opens her home to Precious when she finally runs away from her mother’s uptown apartment. This wouldn’t be such a problem and could be chalked up as a casting quirk if the other “good” characters weren’t also light skinned–and judgmental.
For instance, in an effort to show a positive black male figure, the film takes a minor character in the book, a presumably Puerto Rican EMT, and turns him into Nurse John (played by Lenny Kravitz) who cares for Precious while she’s in the hospital convalescing after having her baby. Of course, he later cashes in on the capital he earned by vigilantly sitting at her bedside by asking Precious to hook him up with Ms. Rain (or her partner, I couldn’t really discern). What’s more disturbing than that, however, is the moment when Precious asks Nurse John, sitting next to her bed eating a bowl of fruit, why he doesn’t like McDonald’s. He responds by saying that he goes to an organic grocery store and refuses to eat “crap” like McDonald’s. The moment is alarming, for it neither advances the film in any way nor adequately allows the viewer the opportunity to interrogate the classist assumptions in Nurse John’s line. The implicit claim in the statement, of course, is that Precious and her classmates choose to eat McDonald’s instead of organic fruit because, of course, there are so many organic grocery stores in Harlem circa 1987, thus making Precious’ unhealthy diet of fried chicken and pig’s feet a choice–and her fault. How very Obama era Reagan era of you. Perhaps I should reassess my first problem with the film.
To add further insult, when Precious asks Ms. Weiss, played by mixed race poster child Mariah Carey, about her racial identity, the social worker skirts the question and opts to buy her client a cherry Coke. Again, the conversation is odd, goes nowhere, and does nothing but subtly validate the skin privilege that Precious is so invested in. Although JoAnn’s door knocker earrings were a nice touch, I didn’t want the only indicator of this time pre-Wesley Snipes 80s era to be a plethora of attractive and nice light skinned folks onscreen. I saw so much yellow I began to feel like a coward; I swore Vanity made a cameo. Such filmic decisions do nothing but reify overused symbols: all the bad guys are shrouded in darkness, sweat, and presumably funk (see The Bluest Eye), while our fairer heroes are bourgie, clean, and always drenched in light. That said, way to go finding the light skinned chick from Head of the Class to play Ms. Rain’s partner. Who knew she was still around?
Third, though I appreciate the decision to make Mary Johnston less monstrous by giving her a monologue slightly different from the one we read in the book, I thought the brief appearance by the grandmother damaging, because her only screen time showed her shaking her head at her daughter. Such small gestures seemingly validated the viewer’s judgment of Mary. Further, it implied that Mary’s abusive and destructive behavior was not a result of her own history (of abuse), that she somehow became monstrous without precedent, without context. Indeed, Mary’s meeting with Miss Weiss and Precious is rendered in a slightly more forgiving light than we see in the novel, but by then the damage has been done. Perhaps viewers lack the capacity to have empathy for both a fat, poor, black girl and her mother. I shouldn’t hope for so much.
Still, the film is significant. I’m not sure it makes audiences uncomfortable enough–the physical abuse seems more terrible than the incest; I don’t know if we understand Precious’ visions of an alternate self as trauma-induced and not daydreams, but I think it’s incredibly important that we see someone like Gabby Sidibe onscreen. I appreciated Mo’Nique’s rather nuanced performance. (Admittedly, I cringed when she seemed to overact her way into a “red gumball” moment during the above mentioned scene.) Though I’m conflicted about having contributed monetarily to empires (Winfrey’s, Perry’s) that seem to have monopolistic and narcissistic impulses–was the Precious come to Jesus moment not a page out of the Tyler Perry playbook?–I understand that one of few ways films like Precious continue to get made is by supporting them while they’re in theaters. I worry that the (light-skinned) savior trope overwhelms the real message of the story: that of perseverance, endurance, and the incredible power in being able to articulate one’s own story, on one’s own terms. I do, however, respect the film for the conversations that will and should be had about all too common issues that are consistently ignored. Precious (hopefully) inspires folks to read the book (before seeing the movie). After seeing the film, I find it imperative that we push to know Precious ourselves.
As always great commentary. I will be referring back to you in my post on Friday.
As always great commentary. I will be referring back to you in my post on Friday.
thanks, fallon. so sorry it was long.
thanks, fallon. so sorry it was long.
damn. was hoping this would be better than that, but of course…tyler perry. oprah winfrey. enough said. thanks for the review.
damn. was hoping this would be better than that, but of course…tyler perry. oprah winfrey. enough said. thanks for the review.
Summer,
actually was surprised how short it was given your love affair with analytical length…lol. all in all great post.
Summer,
actually was surprised how short it was given your love affair with analytical length…lol. all in all great post.
this is so very helpful! thanks so much. it would be really helpful to have a conversation guide for prep and debrief conversations with youth. might you all be working on that? 🙂
by the way – even just seeing the commercials and seeing all the light skinned women cast as teachers and other seemingly “positive” characters was problematic for me and i had the same critique — it’s the light/white teachers as saviors trope (a la freedom writers, etc.)
this is so very helpful! thanks so much. it would be really helpful to have a conversation guide for prep and debrief conversations with youth. might you all be working on that? 🙂
by the way – even just seeing the commercials and seeing all the light skinned women cast as teachers and other seemingly “positive” characters was problematic for me and i had the same critique — it’s the light/white teachers as saviors trope (a la freedom writers, etc.)
Well done Summer M. The point about the context of the 1980’s is so key. This is a really helpful addition to the conversation.
Well done Summer M. The point about the context of the 1980’s is so key. This is a really helpful addition to the conversation.
@crip chick: thanks for reading. it’s not a BAD movie, it just has some real limits. real limits.
@fallon “love affair with analytical length.” i love that.
@johonna: thank you! glad this was helpful. we haven’t discussed a conversation guide (book or movie?), but it’s something i’d be willing to do if you’re interested. i could work on compiling maybe 5 before and 5 after questions (thanks, apg), and send you some links that might be useful for discussion. if this is something you’re interested in, please fill out the contact form (http://www.blackyouthproject.com/misc/contact/) and we can figure something out. i imagine i could get the stuff to you before the film is released everywhere on nov. 20.
@apg: thanks!
thanks, all.
@crip chick: thanks for reading. it’s not a BAD movie, it just has some real limits. real limits.
@fallon “love affair with analytical length.” i love that.
@johonna: thank you! glad this was helpful. we haven’t discussed a conversation guide (book or movie?), but it’s something i’d be willing to do if you’re interested. i could work on compiling maybe 5 before and 5 after questions (thanks, apg), and send you some links that might be useful for discussion. if this is something you’re interested in, please fill out the contact form (http://www.blackyouthproject.com/misc/contact/) and we can figure something out. i imagine i could get the stuff to you before the film is released everywhere on nov. 20.
@apg: thanks!
thanks, all.
Excellent commentary! I share some of the same thoughts/feeling that you expressed in your piece.
..”was the Precious come to Jesus moment not a page out of the Tyler Perry playbook?” WORD!! I thought the exact same thing!! As soon as that part came on, I said to myself, “that musta been Tyler Perry’s contribution”.
I also thought the same thing of Oprah when I peeped her picture on the wall in the scene when Precious’ mom visited her at the Alternative House for the first time.
Excellent commentary! I share some of the same thoughts/feeling that you expressed in your piece.
..”was the Precious come to Jesus moment not a page out of the Tyler Perry playbook?” WORD!! I thought the exact same thing!! As soon as that part came on, I said to myself, “that musta been Tyler Perry’s contribution”.
I also thought the same thing of Oprah when I peeped her picture on the wall in the scene when Precious’ mom visited her at the Alternative House for the first time.
@Shak,
So, that was Oprah on the wall. I wasn’t for sure.
Also, on another unrelated point. I like that I know most of the people commenting on this piece. Just thought I would say that.
@Shak,
So, that was Oprah on the wall. I wasn’t for sure.
Also, on another unrelated point. I like that I know most of the people commenting on this piece. Just thought I would say that.
Summer, unfortunately, I do not know you but thought your review of Precious captured a great deal. Where I got caught up was in the lack of adult accountability (or hint of it, really.) As the past Associate Director, Children’s National Medical Center, Child Protection Division,in DC, for years, I treated hundreds of girls like Precious and her mothers, much less often. Today, I care for poor girls who are victims of incest and other forms of maltreatment in residential programs that I am responsible for as executive director of the National Center for Children and Families. I was missing acountability. It is unrealistic to think that a child can be so deprived of their entitlement to an essential childhood of healthy nurturing, so pervasively betrayed by her family system, and overlooked by most of the community institutions, and the end result is that she moves on through sheer resiliency, a few friends, and a caring, trusting adult. If we are to believe that this is enough for Precious to raise her own offspring and to contribute to the world in a fashion that is befitting of her gifts, we too perpetuate an insufficient understanding of the impact of multiple layers of childhood trauma and our society’s flat, at best mediocre, responses to it.
The film did not really address the above, but maybe the conversations that pursue, will.
Summer, unfortunately, I do not know you but thought your review of Precious captured a great deal. Where I got caught up was in the lack of adult accountability (or hint of it, really.) As the past Associate Director, Children’s National Medical Center, Child Protection Division,in DC, for years, I treated hundreds of girls like Precious and her mothers, much less often. Today, I care for poor girls who are victims of incest and other forms of maltreatment in residential programs that I am responsible for as executive director of the National Center for Children and Families. I was missing acountability. It is unrealistic to think that a child can be so deprived of their entitlement to an essential childhood of healthy nurturing, so pervasively betrayed by her family system, and overlooked by most of the community institutions, and the end result is that she moves on through sheer resiliency, a few friends, and a caring, trusting adult. If we are to believe that this is enough for Precious to raise her own offspring and to contribute to the world in a fashion that is befitting of her gifts, we too perpetuate an insufficient understanding of the impact of multiple layers of childhood trauma and our society’s flat, at best mediocre, responses to it.
The film did not really address the above, but maybe the conversations that pursue, will.
As always summer your insights are provocative and helpful.
Thank you Sheryl for drawing our attention to the nearly non-existent commentary on the structural forces that set up and circumscribe the lives of precious and her mother. I’ve been trying to think of any film that has successfully depicted the way structural forces impact folks lives, let alone sets out to dismantle them.
I hadn’t thought about this but a comment on another blog post about the film brought up that at the end of the film we see precious walking away with her two babies and there’s no discussion of how hard its gonna be with no structural support for her to raise those kids and most likely in the early 90’s, die of AIDS. WHo will take care of her kids then? Will they be put into the system (that the film can’t even really begin to address?)
Sheryl, I’d love to keep thinking about this. Particularly in light of Shaniya Davis’ tragic death.
As always summer your insights are provocative and helpful.
Thank you Sheryl for drawing our attention to the nearly non-existent commentary on the structural forces that set up and circumscribe the lives of precious and her mother. I’ve been trying to think of any film that has successfully depicted the way structural forces impact folks lives, let alone sets out to dismantle them.
I hadn’t thought about this but a comment on another blog post about the film brought up that at the end of the film we see precious walking away with her two babies and there’s no discussion of how hard its gonna be with no structural support for her to raise those kids and most likely in the early 90’s, die of AIDS. WHo will take care of her kids then? Will they be put into the system (that the film can’t even really begin to address?)
Sheryl, I’d love to keep thinking about this. Particularly in light of Shaniya Davis’ tragic death.
I read your post and found it somewhat inaccurate. It is important to understand that Tyler Perry and Oprah Winfrey did not write the screen play for the movie. They were the investors/finacial backers (producers) of the movie so that it could be get made and be distributed through a movie studio such as Lionsgate. The chacter tht Monique played was Mary Jones, not Mary Johnsonton and Nurse John did not show interest in Ms. Rain or her partner at Precious’ beside. It was during her party for receiving the literacy award.
Not every movie based on a book is quite the same. For example, the Color Purple. The book, movie, and play were different but the message was received. That is the same for this book/movie. Many people had previously read the book and then saw the movie, which I recommend that they do in order to get a deeper portrayal and understanding of the characters. The movie also awakened a renewed interest in the book and perhaps many will read it for the first time.
As far as the song by Bobby Brown being played inthe background and its relese date, not aligned witht he year of the movie-the song was not used to portray a significant timeline in the movie, hence, it is not on the soundtrack.
As for Marih Carey’s character, Ms. Weiss-her race was identified on the book. The ligther-complexioned characters in the movie were as such to play on Precious’ view of race and color, along with societies.
However, I am not surprised that people are blaming Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry for each difference between the book and the movie. They were not the Directors of the Writers that adapted the book into a Screenplay.
The book did not go into great detail about the Regan Era. Afterall, it wasn about the era, it was about the lives of these people, particularly the life of Precious. The book was written and based off the real-life events, which the author was made aware of when she was a teacher in Harlem during the 80’s. I think it is important to understand that alot of detail was not placed into the what era these events occurred because these issues are still happening…
I read your post and found it somewhat inaccurate. It is important to understand that Tyler Perry and Oprah Winfrey did not write the screen play for the movie. They were the investors/finacial backers (producers) of the movie so that it could be get made and be distributed through a movie studio such as Lionsgate. The chacter tht Monique played was Mary Jones, not Mary Johnsonton and Nurse John did not show interest in Ms. Rain or her partner at Precious’ beside. It was during her party for receiving the literacy award.
Not every movie based on a book is quite the same. For example, the Color Purple. The book, movie, and play were different but the message was received. That is the same for this book/movie. Many people had previously read the book and then saw the movie, which I recommend that they do in order to get a deeper portrayal and understanding of the characters. The movie also awakened a renewed interest in the book and perhaps many will read it for the first time.
As far as the song by Bobby Brown being played inthe background and its relese date, not aligned witht he year of the movie-the song was not used to portray a significant timeline in the movie, hence, it is not on the soundtrack.
As for Marih Carey’s character, Ms. Weiss-her race was identified on the book. The ligther-complexioned characters in the movie were as such to play on Precious’ view of race and color, along with societies.
However, I am not surprised that people are blaming Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry for each difference between the book and the movie. They were not the Directors of the Writers that adapted the book into a Screenplay.
The book did not go into great detail about the Regan Era. Afterall, it wasn about the era, it was about the lives of these people, particularly the life of Precious. The book was written and based off the real-life events, which the author was made aware of when she was a teacher in Harlem during the 80’s. I think it is important to understand that alot of detail was not placed into the what era these events occurred because these issues are still happening…
Sorry for the typos, broken hand.
Sorry for the typos, broken hand.
@shak: thank you! i really think they re-shot things to make perry and winfrey happy. i really do.
@sheryl: thanks so much for your comment. it’s so necessary to this conversation. like qbg said, it’s imperative that we think of societal forces and the way they both help create and fail girls like precious. we must continue to have this conversation. i will write a precious follow up blog next week, and include your thoughts there. thank you.
also, here’s a conversation you may be interested in: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=178029692367&id=2614893&ref=share
@shak: thank you! i really think they re-shot things to make perry and winfrey happy. i really do.
@sheryl: thanks so much for your comment. it’s so necessary to this conversation. like qbg said, it’s imperative that we think of societal forces and the way they both help create and fail girls like precious. we must continue to have this conversation. i will write a precious follow up blog next week, and include your thoughts there. thank you.
also, here’s a conversation you may be interested in: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=178029692367&id=2614893&ref=share
@lala: thank you for taking the time to comment, esp. w/ your broken hand. i broke my hand once, and there was no way i was typing when it wasn’t required.
that said, i want to clarify some things. first, i don’t think i stated or implied that winfrey and perry wrote the screenplay. what i was suggesting, however, is that the makers of the film possibly re-shot some scenes to pay homage to their financial backers.
second, in the book, precious’ mother’s name is mary johnston. and according to the wiki entry on ‘precious’ they list her as mary johnston; on imdb, they simply list her as mary. since she never married precious’ father, i decided to use what i thought was her maiden name. if she calls herself mary jones in the movie, i’m sorry. i must have missed it. i didn’t take notes and had to work off of memory and the internet.
third, i understand that nurse john didn’t mack to ms. rain and/or her babe until later. maybe my sentence was poorly written. i thought my using the phrase “later cashes in…” conveyed that he didn’t ask for the hook up at precious’ bedside.
perhaps the bobby brown comment was picky of me. but i just think films that endeavor to be good should be accurate, unless one has real reason not to be. besides, filmmakers use music to mark the time period (think ‘forrest gump’). i also just thought the song was a weirdly bad choice.
the book does indicate time period. there’s the farrakhan element removed from the film version, and at least two mentions of ed koch, ny mayor from 78-89, in the book. in fact, i believe there’s a mention of him wanting to shut down a hospital or some other building in harlem. i think those things are really important. harlem circa ’87 is a lot different than the gentrified harlem we have now–heading to sylvia’s was probably not on the ny tourist’s list of things to do–and i think the filmmakers could’ve worked harder at establishing the setting and time.
regarding your take of colorism in the film, i have to disagree. in the book, ms. weiss was white, ms. rain was dark skinned, and nurse john was puerto rican and an insignificant character. in the film, all the good people are light skinned. even precious’ children are light, despite the fact that both precious and her father are dark (not saying it can’t happen, i’m just trying to make a point). i found such casting moves deliberate and irresponsible. further, the movie challenges precious’ opinion of lgbt folks, why not challenge her assumptions about light-skinned people by not making such casting decisions?
i understand that there will be major differences b/w books and their film versions. however, in this case i think we lost much of the power of the novel by trying to tell a different story on screen. alex’s post (http://www.blackyouthproject.com/blog/2009/11/precious-pathologies/#more-3482) does a great job of articulating this point.
finally, i’m not blaming winfrey and perry for the failures of the movie. if anything, i question their reasons for wanting this movie to be produced, and i think it has to do with how they view the lives of black women. i really do.
sorry this comment was so long, but i wanted to make sure i addressed all of your issues with my post.
@lala: thank you for taking the time to comment, esp. w/ your broken hand. i broke my hand once, and there was no way i was typing when it wasn’t required.
that said, i want to clarify some things. first, i don’t think i stated or implied that winfrey and perry wrote the screenplay. what i was suggesting, however, is that the makers of the film possibly re-shot some scenes to pay homage to their financial backers.
second, in the book, precious’ mother’s name is mary johnston. and according to the wiki entry on ‘precious’ they list her as mary johnston; on imdb, they simply list her as mary. since she never married precious’ father, i decided to use what i thought was her maiden name. if she calls herself mary jones in the movie, i’m sorry. i must have missed it. i didn’t take notes and had to work off of memory and the internet.
third, i understand that nurse john didn’t mack to ms. rain and/or her babe until later. maybe my sentence was poorly written. i thought my using the phrase “later cashes in…” conveyed that he didn’t ask for the hook up at precious’ bedside.
perhaps the bobby brown comment was picky of me. but i just think films that endeavor to be good should be accurate, unless one has real reason not to be. besides, filmmakers use music to mark the time period (think ‘forrest gump’). i also just thought the song was a weirdly bad choice.
the book does indicate time period. there’s the farrakhan element removed from the film version, and at least two mentions of ed koch, ny mayor from 78-89, in the book. in fact, i believe there’s a mention of him wanting to shut down a hospital or some other building in harlem. i think those things are really important. harlem circa ’87 is a lot different than the gentrified harlem we have now–heading to sylvia’s was probably not on the ny tourist’s list of things to do–and i think the filmmakers could’ve worked harder at establishing the setting and time.
regarding your take of colorism in the film, i have to disagree. in the book, ms. weiss was white, ms. rain was dark skinned, and nurse john was puerto rican and an insignificant character. in the film, all the good people are light skinned. even precious’ children are light, despite the fact that both precious and her father are dark (not saying it can’t happen, i’m just trying to make a point). i found such casting moves deliberate and irresponsible. further, the movie challenges precious’ opinion of lgbt folks, why not challenge her assumptions about light-skinned people by not making such casting decisions?
i understand that there will be major differences b/w books and their film versions. however, in this case i think we lost much of the power of the novel by trying to tell a different story on screen. alex’s post (http://www.blackyouthproject.com/blog/2009/11/precious-pathologies/#more-3482) does a great job of articulating this point.
finally, i’m not blaming winfrey and perry for the failures of the movie. if anything, i question their reasons for wanting this movie to be produced, and i think it has to do with how they view the lives of black women. i really do.
sorry this comment was so long, but i wanted to make sure i addressed all of your issues with my post.
[…] Summer’s The Black Youth Project Lost in Translation: A Response to Precious […]
[…] Summer’s The Black Youth Project Lost in Translation: A Response to Precious […]